Avon Trekrider Review

Introduction to the Avon Trekrider Tire

Hello, today we’re diving deep into the world of motorcycle tires, specifically focusing on the Avon Trekrider tire. This is a true 50-50 tire, perfectly suited to riders looking for a balance between off-road and on-road performance. Pitting it against market leaders like the cotton LT, Mota’s traction aider adventure, and the Bridgestone IX 41, we’re keen to explore how the Avon Trekrider measures up.

Comparing Trekrider and Trailrider

Earlier in the week, we had the opportunity to test the Trailrider tire from Avon. While at a first glance the tread designs may seem similar, digging deeper reveals stark differences in their characteristics and performance nuances.

Technical Features of the Avon Trekrider Tire

Diving into the technical features, the Trekrider seems to adopt a more simplified approach than the Trailrider. The latter was meticulously developed with a vision of being the best-performing street tire suitable for large adventure bikes. Notably missing in the Trekrider are features like radial technology, advanced variable belting, 3D siping, and multiple compounds. However, simplicity does not necessarily equate to inefficiency.

Performance and Longevity

One might wonder what the Trekrider brings to the table in the absence of such technical features. Avon confidently states that riders can expect a mileage ranging between 5,000 to 12,000 miles with the Trekrider. Granted, this is a broad range. The actual mileage largely hinges on various factors such as the bike’s weight, riding style, tire maintenance, air pressure, and more. For an average rider, a reasonable estimate would be a lifespan of between 5,000 and 8,000 miles for this tire.

The Unique Front Tire Design

When observing the front tire of the Avon Trekrider, the first thing that captures your attention is the distinctive V-style tread pattern. This isn’t just for aesthetics; the design promotes impressive grip, especially offroad.

But that’s not all. The tread pattern appears counterintuitive, looking almost backwards with its Chevron design. However, this is intentional. Avon has crafted it this way to ensure even wear across the tire’s lifespan. The promise is clear: run the tire down to the wear bars without worrying about cupping or uneven tread wear. This tackles a major issue seen with many other 50-50 tires available in the market.

Exploring the Rear Tire Design

Shifting our focus to the back tire, it presents a familiar tread pattern to its front counterpart. However, the direction of the tread is reversed. This design choice allows the tire to dig into the surface effectively, maintaining a continuous grip, especially on off-road terrains. The tread’s initial dig propels debris to the sides, ensuring that the tire maintains its grip. This innovative design from Avon is not just theoretical – it’s crafted from their vast experience, and today it faces a rigorous test.

Additional Features and Real-World Testing

Beyond the tread pattern, another notable feature of the Avon Trekrider is the beveled edge. Unlike many conventional tires that have a straight edge, the Trekrider’s edge is slanted. This serves a dual purpose: firstly, it aids in scooping dirt, and secondly, it prevents the abruptness on the top, reducing the chances of the tire chunking.

Putting the Avon Trekrider Tires to the Test

As we gear up at Chaparral Motorsports, the anticipation to test the Avon Trek Rider tires is palpable. Representing Avon’s 50-50 tire range, they boast a single but sticky compound. Initial impressions upon setting off are promising. The transition feels similar to the Trailrider tires we tested earlier this week. The Trailrider is tailored more towards street conditions, while the Trekrider proudly dons the badge of a balanced 50-50 tire.

How sticky is the single compound of the Avon Trekrider tire?

When assessing motorcycle tires, one primary concern always revolves around the compound’s stickiness. This is especially true for a tire that aims to offer optimal performance both on and off the road. With my previous experiences on the Trailrider tire, which left quite an impression, my expectations for the Trekrider were set high. My curiosity stems mainly from its single compound construction – how would it fare in challenging terrains?

Tread Depth and Road Noise

Distinguishing the Trekrider from the Trailrider, the grooves are notably deeper and broader. Such a design typically alludes to the potential of increased road noise, a common concern for many riders. But Avon’s assurance contradicts this initial assumption. They claim there’s no significant difference in the acoustic output between the Trekrider and its Trailrider counterpart. However, real-world tests are the ultimate judge. Initial observations during traffic congestion made it challenging to make any conclusive judgments about its noise levels.

Freeway Performance

Due to unforeseen traffic conditions, an immediate freeway speed test was momentarily postponed. However, this gave an opportunity to observe its behavior on ramp turns – areas that have historically been problematic for some 50-50 tires. Before venturing to higher speeds and more demanding terrains, we decided to take the tires for a spin in a sandy area – an environment that truly challenges a tire’s grip and handling.

Off-Road Capabilities

Transitioning to off-road terrains, the Trekrider’s performance was immediately evident. The acceleration was noticeably faster compared to the Trailrider. Although quantifying the exact difference was challenging, the Trekrider clearly had an edge when it came to propelling forward. Braking also seemed more refined. However, during high acceleration, there was a slight wiggle from the rear end. Comparing animal tracks on the trail, it was evident the Trekrider had superior forward push, even though there was some side-to-side wander. The goal was to draw comparisons under similar conditions – setting the stage for a head-to-head assessment against its Trailrider counterpart.

Comparative Analysis

Putting two tires to test under identical conditions offers valuable insights.

While both tires showcased their unique strengths, side-by-side comparisons highlighted subtle nuances in their performance. The Trekrider, with its quicker acceleration and forward push, stood out. However, the side wander was a concern that needed further assessment. More exhaustive tests and varied terrains will provide a comprehensive evaluation, painting a clearer picture of the Trekrider’s overall performance.

Initial Observations on the Avon Trekrider Tire

Upon close examination, the Avon Trekrider tire reveals a tread pattern that bears a striking resemblance to some of its counterparts. Given the similarities, my expectations veered towards a predictable performance. However, I was hopeful that the larger grooves would enhance the tire’s overall stability, especially when faced with challenging terrains. Contrary to this, there was a discernible shimmy both at the front and the rear, hinting at some room for improvement. Interestingly, while the tread pattern might appear almost identical to the untrained eye, subtle differences come to light upon closer inspection. The solid bar on one contrasts with the slightly interrupted pattern on the other, adding a touch of uniqueness to each. Testing the tire’s performance on an incline further emphasized the ground’s softness compared to previous visits, raising questions about the tire’s adaptability to varying ground conditions.

Structural Composition and Its Impact

The Avon Trekrider tire distinguishes itself with its bias ply structure, which stands in contrast to the radial tires that one might encounter more commonly. Furthermore, its single-compound makeup offers a unique flavor to its performance. While both these features contribute to its identity, it’s essential to understand how they come together in influencing the tire’s performance in real-world scenarios. Would the Trekrider’s inherent structural differences offer a significant edge or pose limitations?

Performance on Rocky Terrains

The true test of a tire’s capabilities often lies in how it performs on challenging terrains, and rocky paths are no exception. The Trailrider tire had previously set a high benchmark with its ability to navigate such terrains with remarkable ease, even outperforming some of its more dirt-oriented counterparts. So, the obvious question arises: How does the Avon Trekrider fare in comparison? Initial tests indicated a lack of front tire grip, with the tire slipping more than anticipated. This was further compounded by the Sidewinder action, which made handling more of a challenge. A direct comparison of the two tires on the same track offered more insights. The Trekrider, despite its merits, seemed less adaptive to rocky terrains, resulting in a slightly rougher ride. However, it should be noted that the deeper tread grooves did offer a quicker response, hinting at a balance of strengths and weaknesses.

Final Thoughts on Adaptability

While the Avon Trekrider tire boasts commendable features and offers a unique riding experience, its adaptability across different terrains emerges as a point of interest. The tire’s performance on soft grounds and rocky terrains, when juxtaposed, sheds light on its versatility. Whether it’s the tire’s structural composition or the tread pattern that influences this remains a topic for further exploration. As is the case with most motorcycle tires, the Avon Trekrider presents a mix of pros and cons, necessitating a nuanced understanding of its capabilities for an informed choice.

Cornering with the Avon Trekrider

When it comes to motorcycle tires, cornering feedback is crucial. Comparing the Avon Trekrider with its predecessor, the Trailrider tire, some clear distinctions emerge. In both high-speed and slow-speed cornering scenarios, the Trailrider provided impeccably accurate feedback, lending a sense of confidence and precision to the ride. This was especially true when entering, navigating, and exiting corners. However, the Trekrider falls somewhat short in this regard. The tire’s sidewall feedback felt more indistinct, lacking the razor-sharp responsiveness that one would anticipate from a tire of its stature.

Moreover, while applying the same amount of throttle as with the Trailrider, I discerned reduced feedback from both the front and rear tires. This led me to believe that the sidewall’s rigidity might be causing this muted response. Additionally, there’s a tangible difference in traction when leaning into corners. The Trekrider seems to possess a firmer, less forgiving compound on its sides, which could be attributing to this.

Discovering the Intricacies of the Trekrider’s Performance

During my ride, I chanced upon an unexpected revelation. After remounting the motorcycle, it seemed that some settings had been inadvertently altered. Traction control and ABS had been activated, which explained the unexpected power dynamics I had been feeling. After rectifying this oversight, the bike’s performance transformed. While there was still some slippage from the rear tire, it was notably less pronounced. This incident, though unplanned, underscored the tire’s behavior under different bike settings.

With traction control and ABS deactivated, the real character of the tire shone through, yet still, the front end remained grounded, and the rear wasn’t as adhesive as one would expect, especially when compared to the Trailrider.

Tread Wear and Durability Analysis

Observing the tread pattern after some spirited riding reveals some interesting details. Prominent wear on the leading edges indicates that the tire undergoes significant stress during cornering, corroborated by visible signs of lateral drift. This drift, subtle but detectable, was absent in the Trailrider, further highlighting the differences in their compositions. The vertical markings on the tread also serve as testament to this.

Interestingly, the front tire, despite being subjected to the same conditions, showed no such signs of wear, implying a divergence in behavior between the front and rear tires.

On-road Feedback and Adaptability

One significant aspect of a tire’s performance is its adaptability to varied terrains and road conditions. With the Trekrider, while the front tire seems to hold its own commendably, the rear tire’s feedback feels slightly off, especially when considering sidewall responses. Notably, on the track, the rubber’s consistency became so malleable that it appeared to be melting, a phenomenon rarely observed with other tires. Transitioning to gravel roads, the Trekrider’s behavior was consistent with its earlier performance, with the bike showing a tad more bounciness than anticipated. Factors such as sidewall construction and the tire’s underlying technology play pivotal roles in shaping these experiences.

Handling Rocky Terrains with the Avon Trekrider

Navigating the rocky patches on this road brings out the distinctive features of the Avon Trekrider tire. Approaching an upcoming jump, there’s anticipation for increased lift from the rear tire. When we compare the performance on this rocky stretch with the Trailrider tire, it’s apparent. The Trekrider tends to bounce off the rocks instead of conforming around them. It’s surprising to observe how the carcass construction of a tire can significantly influence its comfort and adaptability on such terrains. Nonetheless, in terms of straight-line forward momentum, the Trekrider stands out.

Avon Trekrider vs. Avon Trailrider: A Comparative Analysis

The Avon Trekrider provides a stronger push in straight lines, surpassing its predecessor, the Trailrider. However, when examining side traction, the two seem to offer similar performance levels. As we tackled uphill and downhill sections, the Trekrider presented some challenges. During downhill maneuvers, particularly with a loaded bike, the rear tire demonstrated a tendency to slide more than desired, causing some sideways movement. Conversely, the front tire remained steadfast and didn’t skid, even when faced with similar tread patterns on other terrains. Interestingly, while the Trekrider was expected to outperform the Trailrider in off-road conditions, the reality painted a different picture. Both tires seem to match closely in off-road prowess, with the Trekrider having a slight edge in softer terrains.

Performance on Tarmac and Gravel Roads

Shifting the focus to on-road capabilities, the Trailrider clearly outshines the Trekrider. Whether it’s the tire’s overall performance on tarmac or its behavior on gravel roads strewn with rocks, the Trailrider demonstrates superior adaptability and comfort. It’s worth noting that while the Trekrider’s tread pattern was anticipated to offer enhanced traction, the real-world experience has been a mix of hits and misses. In softer terrains, the Trekrider propels the bike forward more efficiently, but when it comes to side traction and on-road performance, the two tires are neck and neck, with the Trailrider slightly edging ahead in certain conditions.

Trailrider’s Performance on Rocky Paths

The Trailrider showcased exceptional performance, thanks to its radial construction.

This design allows the tire to seamlessly adapt to rocky terrains, offering a ride that feels more like a gentle wrap around the rocks rather than a jarring bounce. During my testing, the Trailrider stood out for its value, especially given its impressive handling. On a similar terrain, the Trekrider did not provide the same sense of stability and control. Bouncing and sliding made it difficult to halt. Between the two Avon variants, I would lean towards the Trailrider for demanding off-road conditions. It comes across as a more versatile choice, whereas the Trekrider, despite being a 50/50 tire, seems to incorporate some compromises.

Trekrider’s Journey through California

Transitioning to California’s renowned landscapes, the Trekrider demonstrated its mettle as a true 50/50 tire. Throughout the journey, it maintained stability and showed minimal deviations, even on the trickiest of terrains. On returning to Saffron Motorsports, after a full day of evaluation, it became evident that while the Trekrider is a commendable tire, it doesn’t match the technological prowess of the Trailrider. The latter boasts a radial construction and multi-compound design, offering a superior riding experience.

The Avon Trekrider: An All-Rounder?

The Avon Trekrider is undeniably versatile, excelling on off-road trails, and holding its own on tarmac. Its performance in deep sand could be improved, but its efficacy on paved roads cannot be denied. However, its bias construction doesn’t provide the kind of road feedback one might expect from an Avon tire. But looking at the bigger picture, its longevity, as highlighted by Avon, ranges between 6,000 to 10,000 miles, which is commendable. If an all-around tire for adventurous rides is what you seek, the Avon Trekrider is worth considering. But for those prioritizing superior on-road performance, the Trailrider is the way to go.

Conclusion

Choosing the right tire is crucial for both safety and performance. While both the Avon Trekrider and Trailrider have their strengths, the ideal choice hinges on individual needs and preferences. For those who value adaptability across terrains and longevity, the Trekrider stands out. However, if cutting-edge technology, responsiveness, and on-road excellence are paramount, the Trailrider emerges as the frontrunner. As with all purchases, it’s about aligning the product’s features with one’s requirements. So, evaluate your riding conditions, expectations, and prioritize accordingly before making a decision.